Comments on: Power Cyclone Technologies, Inc (OTCPK: CYPW)

By: austpom333

austpom333 — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:37:00 +0000

No, I do not buy the argument. Electrisity prices explode? It is necessary to reconnect with the real test, people will spend more money for electricity, and they do not spend money on fuel OLD DON T Fossel ‘no longer exists. As I mentioned earlier coal is the fuel FUEL Fößel Fößel transition, for God’s sake he changes his mind before leaving earth. I do not know if you read my last e-mail, he explained that these future electric or magnetic engines already invented. keep writing

By: mariasman100

mariasman100 — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:25:19 +0000

Is your business if you expect the port to the Cycclone magnet motor, or similar, but has been used as a basis for discussion is not likely to be fruitful. You should be very skeptical about these statements of the IMO.

By: austpom333

austpom333 — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:25:01 +0000

No, I’m not skeptical about any claims of progression and subsequent introduction of the magnets or electric motors.

By: austpom333

austpom333 — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:44:43 +0000

There battories new, invented, takes very little time to calculate, you know, how fast are electric cars? I have to take a 110mm 12-volt drill, screw pine drive, if I put it on wheels and a gearbox make almost 300 K. with very low and no environmental pollution. I do not think people here are correctly interpreted my arguments here.

By: Nate2203

Nate2203 — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:14:46 +0000

You have the hydraulic brake system seen rain, it is more efficient than current security. And it was one of its engines to exhaust waste heat to run a generator, an auxiliary battery to the load.

By: mariasman100

mariasman100 — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:23:30 +0000

No skepticism? It can be both optimistic and skeptical. I hope they develop, but have serious doubts. Of course, differ between the two, please “magnetic motor” versus “electric.”

By: Nate2203

Nate2203 — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:56:56 +0000

Not seem to understand that energy can be generated.

By: Nate2203

Nate2203 — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:28:55 +0000

“No, I’m not skeptical about any claims of progression and the possible adoption of magnets or electric motors.” This right is not why you’re an idiot. Question: How much to buy shit late night infomercials?

By: mariasman100

mariasman100 — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:07:03 +0000

Yes, I have seen. . . IMO very impressive. But these are best reserved for limited applications. My main argument is that, unlike combustion engines, the Cyclone engine efficiency varies little about its scope. Therefore, there would be little to gain “hybrid.” Of course, any regenerative braking system to increase fuel economy in city driving. . . and this applies to any vehicle (below). . .

By: mariasman100

mariasman100 — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:58:04 +0000

. . . From his place a great source of energy to fuel the engine will not idle, he has done, if the vehicle is at rest at a very low speed (ie stop and go traffic). Could be a battery, but I understand that you are using the first prototype of a more ultracapacitor vehicle regenerative braking.