www. ecostocks. by
Power Cyclone Technologies, Inc (OTCPK: CYPW)
July 29th, 2010 by admin Leave a reply »
Advertisement
© 2010 Stock Market Now! · Proudly powered by WordPress & Green Park 2 by Cordobo.
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional | Valid CSS 3
@ Rickdeckard2020, we take a look at yourself. The average thermal power plants is 33% efficient in converting heat into electricity and the losses in the current distribution of property is 10.9%. This is 30% at home. Now factor in other areas: the charger, controller / inverter, battery charge / discharge motor. . . and looking for the real world and the average efficiency and cycling (no “peak” efficiency).
@ Mariasman100Ich data would have to see appreciate your 20% sounds extreme, from what I read theres just a percentage (small) loss of energy between the power outlet to the movement. As for the power plant that I do not know, but I go with him.
@ NeoGenXRevelations, you are sure you know how to configure the system?
@ PeterTenev, no transfer is easy, because it is not necessary. By clicking the “choke” to open the steam inlet valves to a longer duration of each cycle, increasing the mean effective pressure in the cylinders. This provides more torque for acceleration or climbing is necessary. The mean effective pressure can not do much in an internal combustion engine, so it uses a gearbox to change gear ratios are changed to torque. . . residues, a large amount of energy.
@ Rickdeckard2020, but the whole process of energy conversion are involved in electric propulsion, will be considered for a fair comparison. Take the average efficiency of the plants in the U.S. Now factor in the loss of electric power transmission and transformers, battery charger, battery, battery performance, motor controller and motor. The net return below 20%.
@ Mariasman100Ich that most of the energy of an electric car becomes movement, this engine generates an output, but part of the energy is channeled towards the exhaust heat. If heat removal systems can be used to some heat during cold winters or reused, it would be even more interesting. Could have great potential as a backup generator in a cold and distant, not
One can understand that I can not – why not be a transfer? Transmission has a role completely different from what other Triebfeder.und – What if I need more power in a way to push the gas? Would be responsible enough to make a decent overtaking? I need something that can take my health, when there is no more brauchten.aber energy when this item is a new chapter – the design specification. the engine. if we are informed more precisely about it?
For anyone who has an understanding of thermodynamics can be seen that most of the heat lost into the environment instead of work produced, unfortunately, Ph. D, does not mean that they sound like to keep this conversation Menschenverstand.Ich request peaceful.
@ NeoGenXRevelations Yes, a group of men with Ph. D’s in urgent need of your tips.
I like the idea of using a “Twister” with a couple power and a more efficient system will provide ice, but the inventor is about to go wrong. The inventor of the forces against the forces of gehen.das more efficient system would be the heat source was isolated, and the forces are not acting against each other. You have to want to understand the new, such as cyclones, work and tips wiederholen.wenn inventor to contact me.
Thank you, I check out!
To write mariesman “Shai Agassi, a bold plan for mass production of electric cars acceptance” in youtube. I do not know if you’ve seen his speech. Best of luck to you.
I hope so.
Reply to mariasman, invented in this case, new batteries in the near future of electric powered cars to ensure that you and change the mind of thought and ideas reflected the world public opinion.
The performance of electric cars is a function of its low end torque, which is ideal for use in automobiles. The Cyclone engine is a torque profile is very similar, but with greater torque. The power density of the cyclone is also much higher. Remember that the lithium ion battery for the Chevrolet Volt a range of only 40 miles offers still weighs 400 pounds. The engine weighs 330 pounds Cyclone Automotive completed. The net return of the cyclone is also better than the electrics.
. . . From his place a great source of energy to fuel the engine will not idle, he has done, if the vehicle is at rest at a very low speed (ie stop and go traffic). Could be a battery, but I understand that you are using the first prototype of a more ultracapacitor vehicle regenerative braking.
Yes, I have seen. . . IMO very impressive. But these are best reserved for limited applications. My main argument is that, unlike combustion engines, the Cyclone engine efficiency varies little about its scope. Therefore, there would be little to gain “hybrid.” Of course, any regenerative braking system to increase fuel economy in city driving. . . and this applies to any vehicle (below). . .
“No, I’m not skeptical about any claims of progression and the possible adoption of magnets or electric motors.” This right is not why you’re an idiot. Question: How much to buy shit late night infomercials?
Not seem to understand that energy can be generated.
No skepticism? It can be both optimistic and skeptical. I hope they develop, but have serious doubts. Of course, differ between the two, please “magnetic motor” versus “electric.”
You have the hydraulic brake system seen rain, it is more efficient than current security. And it was one of its engines to exhaust waste heat to run a generator, an auxiliary battery to the load.
There battories new, invented, takes very little time to calculate, you know, how fast are electric cars? I have to take a 110mm 12-volt drill, screw pine drive, if I put it on wheels and a gearbox make almost 300 K. with very low and no environmental pollution. I do not think people here are correctly interpreted my arguments here.
No, I’m not skeptical about any claims of progression and subsequent introduction of the magnets or electric motors.
Is your business if you expect the port to the Cycclone magnet motor, or similar, but has been used as a basis for discussion is not likely to be fruitful. You should be very skeptical about these statements of the IMO.
No, I do not buy the argument. Electrisity prices explode? It is necessary to reconnect with the real test, people will spend more money for electricity, and they do not spend money on fuel OLD DON T Fossel ‘no longer exists. As I mentioned earlier coal is the fuel FUEL Fößel Fößel transition, for God’s sake he changes his mind before leaving earth. I do not know if you read my last e-mail, he explained that these future electric or magnetic engines already invented. keep writing